Content & Contributions
Shaping knowledge together. Our editorial standards, contribution workflow, and guidelines for creating verified, high-quality encyclopedia entries.
Our Editorial Pillars
Every article on Aevum Encyclopedia is built upon five foundational principles. These ensure that our knowledge base remains accurate, trustworthy, and universally accessible.
- Accuracy: All factual claims must be traceable to reliable, verifiable sources. Speculation is clearly labeled and separated from established knowledge.
- Neutrality: Articles present multiple perspectives fairly, avoiding editorial bias while acknowledging consensus where it exists.
- Verifiability: "Truth" on Aevum is determined by citation, not authority. If it isn't sourced, it doesn't belong.
- Originality: No copy-pasting. All content must be synthesized, rewritten, or properly attributed. Plagiarism results in immediate content removal.
- Accessibility: Writing should be clear, structured, and readable for both experts and curious laypeople. Jargon is defined or linked.
Topics must meet our notability threshold: significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Niche or emerging topics may be included under "Developing Fields" with appropriate context.
Contribution Workflow
Contributing to Aevum is structured to maintain quality while remaining open to qualified writers. Here's how the process works:
Create Account
Sign up with email or institutional SSO. New contributors undergo a brief onboarding quiz.
Search or Draft
Search for existing articles. If none exist, create a draft in your personal workspace.
Write & Cite
Follow our markup guidelines. Add inline citations and reference lists using supported formats.
Submit for Review
Trigger peer review. AI pre-checks formatting and citation integrity before human review.
Revision & Publish
Address reviewer feedback. Once approved, your article goes live and enters version history.
Monitor & Update
Authors retain stewardship. Set reminders for periodic updates as new research emerges.
Content Guidelines
To maintain consistency across millions of articles, we enforce structural and stylistic standards:
Structure & Formatting
- Use clear hierarchical headings (H2 for main sections, H3 for subsections)
- Keep paragraphs concise (3â5 sentences)
- Lead with a summary paragraph stating scope and key facts
- Use tables for comparative data, but always cite the source
- Avoid walls of text; use lists, callouts, and media strategically
Tone & Voice
Write in the third person, present tense where applicable, and encyclopedic tone. Avoid colloquialisms, hyperbole, or promotional language. When discussing controversies, attribute claims to their sources and maintain neutrality.
Original research, personal opinions, unverified claims, defamatory statements, and heavily promotional material are strictly prohibited and will be removed during review.
AI & Human Oversight
Aevum embraces AI as a tool, not an author. Our policy ensures technology enhances accuracy without compromising editorial integrity.
- AI Drafting Allowed: You may use LLMs to structure outlines, suggest citations, or refine prose.
- Human Verification Required: Every fact, date, name, and statistical claim must be manually verified against primary or secondary sources.
- AI Fact-Check Layer: Our platform runs automated cross-referencing against academic databases and trusted news archives to flag inconsistencies.
- Disclosure: Articles heavily assisted by AI must tag the "AI-Assisted Draft" badge during submission for editorial awareness.
Citation Standards
References are the backbone of Aevum. We support and prefer the following formats:
- Chicago Manual of Style (Notes-Bibliography) for humanities and history
- APA 7th Edition for social sciences and psychology
- Vancouver/AMA for medicine and life sciences
- IEEE for engineering and computer science
Inline citations must use bracketed numbers [1] linked to a formatted reference list. URLs should be archived via Wayback Machine or Perma.cc when possible.
Always link DOI numbers where available. Avoid relying on Wikipedia, blogs, or unverified forums as primary sources. Peer-reviewed journals and official publications are preferred.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Shape the Future of Knowledge?
Join thousands of researchers, educators, and writers contributing to the world's most trusted open encyclopedia.
Become a Contributor Download Full Guidelines (PDF)