Edit Policies & Contribution Guidelines

How we maintain accuracy, neutrality, and scholarly integrity across 2.4 million articles in 140+ languages.

Last reviewed: October 2025 • Policy v4.2

Core Principles

All edits, whether suggested by AI-assisted tools or human contributors, must adhere to these foundational standards. Deviations will be flagged for review.

⚖️ Neutral Point of View (NPOV)

Articles must fairly represent all significant, published perspectives on a topic. Biased language, promotional tone, or unverified claims are prohibited.

🔍 Verifiability & Sourcing

Every factual claim must be traceable to a reputable, primary or secondary source. AI-generated summaries must cite their training references. Uncited material may be removed.

🚫 No Original Research

Aevum does not publish unpublished data, personal theories, or novel synthesis. Content must reflect established, peer-reviewed, or widely recognized knowledge.

🤝 Civility & Respect

Discussions on talk pages and review queues must remain constructive. Harassment, trolling, or bad-faith editing results in immediate suspension.

©️ Copyright & Media Licensing

All uploaded media must be public domain, Creative Commons, or properly licensed. AI-generated images must be clearly tagged. Plagiarism is strictly enforced.

Editing Workflow

Every change passes through a structured pipeline to balance rapid knowledge updates with rigorous verification.

1

Draft

Contributor submits edit via web or mobile editor.

2

AI Pre-Check

Automated validation for citations, tone, and policy compliance.

3

Peer Review

Subject-matter experts or verified editors assess accuracy.

4

Publication

Changes go live with full version history and attribution.

Turnaround time: Minor edits are typically reviewed within 2–24 hours. Major rewrites or sensitive topics may take up to 72 hours.

Content Standards

Structure & Formatting

  • Use clear headings (H2–H4) with logical hierarchy
  • Lead paragraph must define the topic concisely (1–3 sentences)
  • Tables and infographics must include source attribution
  • Mathematical formulas and code blocks require syntax highlighting

Citation Requirements

Accepted sources include peer-reviewed journals, academic publishers, government databases, and reputable news agencies. Personal blogs, unverified forums, and self-published material are not acceptable as primary sources.

Translation & Localization

Multilingual editions must maintain conceptual accuracy. Direct translations are encouraged, but culturally specific examples should be adapted where necessary. All translations undergo native-speaker review.

Contributor Tiers & Trust Levels

Access and editing privileges scale with demonstrated reliability and domain expertise.

Tier 1 Observer

Read-only access. Can suggest edits via the "Propose Change" form. All suggestions require full peer review.

Tier 2 Contributor

Verified account with completed training module. Can edit non-sensitive articles. Changes are fast-tracked through AI validation.

Tier 3 Verified Editor

Demonstrated track record of 50+ accepted edits. Can review other contributors, resolve minor disputes, and edit sensitive topics.

Tier 4 Subject Expert

Professionally credentialed (PhD, industry certification, or institutional affiliation). Has final authority on domain-specific content and mediates complex disputes.

Reporting & Dispute Resolution

If you encounter vandalism, bias, or policy violations, use the "Report Issue" button on any article. Reports are triaged within 24 hours.

Dispute Escalation Path

  1. Talk Page Discussion: Contributors attempt to resolve differences directly.
  2. Mediation Request: A neutral verified editor reviews both sides and suggests compromises.
  3. Policy Committee: Unresolved cases involving policy interpretation are escalated to the Editorial Board for a binding decision.

Repeated or severe policy violations result in temporary suspension or permanent revocation of editing privileges. All enforcement actions are documented and appealable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Guest users can propose changes via the suggestion form, but all edits require full peer review and take longer to publish. Creating a free account unlocks faster processing and edit history tracking.
AI tools help validate citations, detect biased phrasing, check formatting standards, and suggest related sources. AI does not approve edits; human experts retain final authority on all content.
Accidental errors are corrected through the normal revision process. Good-faith mistakes do not result in penalties. Deliberate misinformation or repeated negligence may lead to temporary suspension.
Complete the contributor training, accumulate 50 accepted edits across diverse topics, and maintain a neutral, well-sourced editing history. You can request a tier upgrade via your account dashboard.
No. While AI can draft initial translations, every multilingual article must be reviewed and approved by a native-speaking contributor or expert to ensure accuracy and cultural appropriateness.